Forum Govt invites suggestions for union budget 2023-24
WIC should publish this request by the Government of India so that maximum inputs are received.
Devindra Sethi
‘Scrap the colonial legacy’
Madras High Court while censuring CRPF for following colonial ‘orderly duty’ practice in force and directed the Centre to take immediate steps to stop it. The news item was widely reported on November 19 ,2022 in the mainstream media. Slamming CRPF, the High Court in its hard-hitting judgment, has ordered punishment for all seniors and recover the salaries of orderlies from the seniors who enjoyed their services, gratis. Incidentally, Tamil Nadu police is reportedly free of orderly culture. A landmark judgment of Madras High Court will get the support of all and sundry. It is common knowledge that the orderlies perform all household and menial jobs in police forces. The practice prevails in all Central Armed Police Forces causing massive drain on public exchequer. Why blame CRPF. We have all seen the tents being pitched outside the bungalows of para-military officers to accommodate hoards of guards, cooks, drivers, security staff and general factotums. The ubiquitous colonial practice of engaging personal orderlies, is not only demeaning but also avoidable. This is, however, justified for officers posted in forward areas, but not at the headquarters. The Sahayaks (Orderlies) are combatant soldiers serving in units or HQ functioning on war establishments. Officers get orderlies, free of cost, to carry out domestic work 24 hours a day and 365 days a year. Recall an instance when a low-ranking soldier of the army complained about his routine task of polishing the shoes of his superior officer. The vicious practice, one is sure, should be demoralizing the sahayaks especially in India, which has been highly stratified by caste-ridden hierarchies. A person decides to leave his village and join the army to better his social standing among his peers and not for boot-polishing and performing household chores. Indian Navy and Air Force, as per common knowledge, do not have the system of Orderlies. There are no Sahayaks in these two wings. Only the army is continuing with the British legacy. The facility could be confined to senior Army officers of the level of Brigadiers and above. Why blame the army? The IAS, IPS also keep the sahayaks (constables, head constables and even inspectors) at their residences. Officers of other organised services like the Indian Forest Service do not lag behind. Last, but not the least , the political class are shamelessly enjoying the services of formal and informal civilian staff and officers, free of cost, who are always at their command. They are bonded labour.
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)
RTI Action taken report and note sheet of daily progress on his complaint
The appellant had a grievance regarding non-allotment of his alternate entitled land area for construction of a shop in lieu of the land acquired by the Damodar Valley Corporation which caused him financial stress. He sought an action taken report on his application along with a note sheet of daily progress on his complaint which was denied under sections 8(1)(g) & 8(1)(h) of the RTI Act. The CIC ruled that blanket denial of information was not appropriate. The PIO was directed to provide a revised reply indicating the categorical action taken on the averred complaint along with the relevant available information after procuring the same from the actual record holder after applying severability in consonance with Section 10 of RTI Act. Regarding allocation of land area for his shop, the CIC held that it is purely a matter of grievance which is not amenable under the RTI Act.
Comments
The Right to Information Act provides the mechanism for procuring information which can be used for the redressal of any grievance. It is not, by itself, a forum for grievance redressal.
Citation: Amal Mandal v. Damodar Valley Corporation, File No: CIC/DVCOR/A/2022/120453, Date of Decision: 03.11.2022
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com