Tuesday, October 20, 2026
Live
“
“
Voices from the corridors

Whispers Forum

Debates, reader views and sharp takes on the issues shaping governance — a new conversation every week, archived by date.

0 posts 0 months Latest: 4 Feb 2025
  Browse by date   All posts3210
  2026213
  2025357
  2024357
  2023357
  2022351
  2021342
  2020349
  2019340
  2018332
  2017212

February 2025 28 posts · page 3 of 3

Clear filter
Tuesday, 4 February 2025
Forum

The 90-hour work-week

The L&T chairperson’s recent suggestion about introducing 90-hour a week in offices, is inhuman, anti-people, reflecting a capitalist mindset. The thoughtless limit is significantly higher than even the 70-hour work-week advocated by the Infosys chairperson. Let us look at it dispassionately with a 360 degree perspective.
The suggestion has sparked off a controversy about productivity, work-life balance.life-long consequences and future of corporate culture. Need it hardly be mentioned that the employees working in corporate sector do not get salaries and perks at par with their founders and top management?Large time is wasted by them for reaching offices due to inadequate transport facilities. In this context, China’s infamous ‘996’ work culture, expecting employees to work from 9am to 9pm, six days a week, was condemned as modern-day slavery. Countries like Malaysia, South Korea, Singapore and Japan had once introduced long working hours. However, this was soon given up due to high social costs.
Worse, working beyond 40 to 50 hours a week, is fraught with diminishing returns leading to mental and physical stress and health issues resulting in negative impact in the form of accidents and even costly mistakes. Is this corporate culture?.Employees have to be treated with dignity and empathy instead of leaving them to die due to over-work at work places. By introducing a 7-day week with no week-ends off, how much time will be left to spend with families? Worse still, nuclear families, with no support services will be the worst-hit.
Having said that, I would urge the business honchos to refrain from making such sweeping statements without considering all relevant facts, unsupported by evidence to get cheap publicity. The government, as the model employer, one is sure, will never allow such top-down imposition of long working hours in office without consulting the stake-holders.
A K Saxena (Former civil servant)
Monday, 3 February 2025
RTI

Selling parts of the seized vehicles

The RTI applicant alleged that the registered scrap dealer in association with the ASI of the Transport Department, Delhi, instead of sending the vehicle to the registered scrapping yard, opens it at another location and sells its parts. He stated that this information can be verified through the CCTV footage of the registered pang yard. After the vehicle is picked up by the Transport Department's team, it is checked whether the vehicle has gone to the registered pang yard at the given address or been sent elsewhere. After a few days, the owner receives messages regarding the registration and related payment on the provided phone number. The applicant sought certain information relating to the same. The CIC held that the instant RTI application has not been adequately answered and directed the PIO to revisit the contents of RTI application and provide revised information. The CIC issued an advisory under Section 25(5) of the RTI Act to the Transport Department, GNCTD, for (i) amending the concerned Rules to incorporate the provisions for inspection of seized end-of-life vehicles to its owner; and (ii) upfront disclosure of information regarding Rules, Bye laws, SoP, Guidelines, Office Orders governing RVSFs (Registered Vehicle Scrapping Facilities) under Section 4 of the RTI Act in public domain, to make it easy for a layperson particularly vehicle owners to get relevant information through website.
Comments
The Transport Department has ordered the registered dealer to retain the engine number and chassis number by cutting and preserving them. The guidelines for releasing end of life vehicle (ELV) seized as part of enforcement drive should be put in public domain. If section 4 of the RTI Act is implemented fully, it would relieve the Public Authority of the burden of RTI Applications.
Citation :V Singh v. Transport Department, Delhi, CIC/TDDEL/A/2023/649458; Date of Decision: 16.01.2025
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Vishakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books PIO’s Guide to RTI and Right to Information – Law and Practice. Her weekly article is being published since 2008 on this site. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and third party audit to individuals / organisations. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation at the link https://www.rtifoundationofindia.com
Forum

Long delay in meeting

There is a long delay in conducting the meeting of Central Service Board by DoPT for appointment against Deputy Secretary and Director. It caused a lot of trouble for officers of the central civil service .
A Visitor
Saturday, 1 February 2025
Forum

Who is a Delhite?

Who is a Delhite? They promise to make Delhi a New York, London and Paris. They do not want Delhi to be Delhi. The great battle of the Mahabharat might have been fought in Kurukshetra but Delhi suffered collateral damage. It is suffering a different kind of continuing Mahabharat for votes. God! What can’t a vote make of a man or a woman? I can venture to say that the Vote Maketh the Man, not the tailor makes the man! Can someone please assure Delhi its millenniums long identity along with its Jamuna ji/Yamuna ji (according to choice)? Please do not make Delhi New York, London or Paris to create tourist attractions! Like in the Mahabharat, warrior kings from all states in India, along with their large private armies have gathered to fight the Vote Mahabharat, it is not to protect any Hastinapur but to make a ruin of Delhi. The Kaurav & Pandava, children of democracy, are determined to destroy each other in this vote Mahabharat, while the Guru, Kulguru, Dharma incarnate and the blind king watch helplessly and the Bhisma of a Constitution survives only for the power of death at will or Ichhamrityu. In these 75 years Delhi has changed so much that it is unable to recognize itself. Someone rightly said: Dilli ki loot machi hai, chaho so loot lo! Nobody owns Delhi, though those who could not make it London have built a poor replica of the Buckingham Palace which they pride in being called the Sheesh Mahal, invoking affinity with Mughal rulers like Shah Jahan to Aurangzeb. Such a virgin territory of a kingdom? Only Dushashan proclaims himself to be the Malik of Dilli. Everyone watches the goings on in silence in such an extraordinary situation knowing not which extraordinary remedy can bring order in Delhi. Unless Delhi is made a Mayor’s system, it may become Dilli once again to facilitate some Gulam Dynasty/Slave Dynasty to establish its rule forever!
M L Gupta