RTI Reply in Hindi
The appellant claimed that he was working as a carpenter at the Rashtriya Rifles Bn and was asked to perform fence sentry duty at night. He sought certain information about it including if duty can be assigned with those weapons for which training has not been imparted. The appellant claimed that though he had specifically requested that a reply be provided in Hindi, he was given a reply in English. The CIC directed to provide a Hindi version of the reply provided by the PIO. As the appellant had shown an inability in understanding any communication other than Hindi, the translated copy of the CIC order was also provided.
Comments
The RTI Act does not put an obligation to translate the available information. The applicant should be provided the information in the form it is maintained with the public authority.
Citation: Pankaj Kumar v. Rashtriya Rifles in File No CIC/IARMY/A/2019/117057 dated 17.03.202
Dr. Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is an expert on RTI matters and has co-authored the books RIGHT TO INFORMATION - LAW AND PRACTICE and PIO’s guide to RTI. Apart from her weekly article here, her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link: www.rtifoundationofindia.com
Forum BABU : NAME AND CULTURE
Recently, the Prime Minister came down heavily on the ‘babu culture’ in the country.
Who made civil servants ‘babus’ in the first place?
There are two types of ‘babus’ in India. One ‘babu’ can be found in the conversations of the higher echelons of society. The second ‘babu’ is an older term. When the PM blasted the ‘babu’ culture, he probably meant the Steel Frame of India, its civil servants.
To quote from the PM: ‘Sab kuch babu hi karenge. IAS ban gaye matlab woh fertilizer ka kaarkhana bhi chalayege, chemical ka kaarkhana bhi chalayege, IAS ho gaye toh woh hawai jahaz bhi chalayege. Yeh kaunsi badi taakat bana kar rakh di hai humne?’.
‘Babu’, in popular parlance, implies a government worker who is lazy and deliberately delays processes. The term that reeks of the colonial era has been stuck with civil servants and other government officials. The IAS Association criticized the use of the word in 2016.
Many IAS officers are professionals, like the employees of other offices. Most of them have to handle more than one department during their service, but they obviously don’t serve all departments.
The question arises: who benefits from the ‘Babudom’ that was lately referred to? Obviously the government that has appointed IAS officers to pivotal posts such as Shaktikanta Das, a history graduate, a former Revenue Secretary and no more than a ‘career babu’, who was made Governor of the Reserve Bank of India. Or R.K. Singh, a former IAS officer from Bihar, who was given two ministries by the government.
IAS officers have been handling the most coveted posts. But they do not appoint themselves.
The IAS falls under the All India Services, and its members are initially posted in the districts. There, they gain experience in Health, Agriculture, Education, Law and Order and other fields and learn how to implement democratic processes. They are supposed to be the facilitators.
They seldom have the domain knowledge for all their postings (such as in aviation, chemical industry or electronics) but it is also true that they have an understanding of government procedures which makes them quite indispensable. One can’t easily bypass procedures in government, because that could invite exploitation of rules and lead to disdain for peoples’ rights.
This understanding of procedures is so crucial that in the much-debated farm laws, the ‘babus’ were given the task to deal with dispute-settlement.
Or take the Coronavirus pandemic and the migrant workers’ exodus. The government – Centre or States – could just about manage the situation because of the officers on the ground – the so-called ‘babus’.
An officer is a public servant, but in reality, he/she has to act like a political servant, more or less, and that is where the problem lies. If the political executive is keen to remove ‘Babudom’ from State institutions, its interference in the civil services should be reduced.
Everyone knows that by clearing one examination, any person doesn’t become a ‘babu’. It’s the system that treats them as such. The ‘Mai-Baap’ attitude passes on to them and the public starts treating them as such.
With pressure and responsibility, they go from being professionals to ‘babus’.
Arun Bhatnagar, former Secretary, GoI
Sinha’s resignation for personal reasons - a mystery !
The real reason behind resignation of Principal Advisor of PM, P. K. Sinha for personal reasons, is a mystery. May be someone in the know can throw some light.
N Ramu