Some officers wrongly advising govt
Some corrupt and disgruntled babus of labour ministry are creating problems to govt by wrongly advising govt in case of enhancement of tax gratuity of Rs 20 lakhs we 29th march 2018 as against cabinet approval w.e.f. January 1, 2016, not implementing SC order of EPS 95 pension to exempted CPSE . so that around 90 lakhs ( vote equivalent 4 crores) will go against MODI govt in coming 2019 general election. There are certain private sector who are dead against GST, demonetisation, benami properties, action against black money played vital role in these decisions/gazzete publication/orders/act.
Rao
“Why do governments lose in courts ?”
Governments at the Centre and States and their associates in the country are the largest litigants. Ironically, they are also the largest losers. No one seems to bother about the resultant loss of revenue to public exchequer.
Government cases are usually defended in courts by standing counsels empanelled Min of Law at Centre and States. Selections involve use of discretionary powers.Subjectivity is bound to creep in. Private lawyers’ track records, success rates, merit, non-compliance of prescribed criteria and guidelines tend to get ignored for extraneous considerations. Political interference sidelines merit. Standing counsels, more often than not, fail to attach importance to government cases, giving more time to their private clients. The govt counsels are over-awed by presence of distinguished lawyers engaged by the opposite parties on payment of hefty fees ( in cash). All government payments are made by cheques. This acts as a deterrent.
Things are not hunky dory. Situation in States are far worse, shameful. A reality check and corrective measures are necessary to arrest further deterioration.
A K Saxena ( A former civil servant)
Rao
“Why do governments lose in courts ?”
Governments at the Centre and States and their associates in the country are the largest litigants. Ironically, they are also the largest losers. No one seems to bother about the resultant loss of revenue to public exchequer.
Government cases are usually defended in courts by standing counsels empanelled Min of Law at Centre and States. Selections involve use of discretionary powers.Subjectivity is bound to creep in. Private lawyers’ track records, success rates, merit, non-compliance of prescribed criteria and guidelines tend to get ignored for extraneous considerations. Political interference sidelines merit. Standing counsels, more often than not, fail to attach importance to government cases, giving more time to their private clients. The govt counsels are over-awed by presence of distinguished lawyers engaged by the opposite parties on payment of hefty fees ( in cash). All government payments are made by cheques. This acts as a deterrent.
Things are not hunky dory. Situation in States are far worse, shameful. A reality check and corrective measures are necessary to arrest further deterioration.
A K Saxena ( A former civil servant)