‘Quality of Civil services; poor governance? "
The civil servants mostly retired or re-employed after superannuation, belonging to 1950's, 60's and 70's batches of the last millennium share the perception that there has been a downslide in the quality of civil services over the last several decades. The much hyped “steel frame of civil services", Patel's favourite expression, is losing its sheen. The steel frame is totally rusted and tin-twisted. Public remains the worst sufferer. What has gone wrong? Is the pattern of recruitment flawed? Selection, a number game. Cut off is vacancy-based. Weightage of interviews (PTs in UPSC parlance) is low. No minimum qualifying cut-off for PTs. It was prevalent when I wrote the IAS etc exam in 1971. In other words, an aspirant under existing dispensation, could still top the UPSC merit list despite low marks in PT. The general impression has been that intra- and inter- services animosity among organised services increased due to multi-layered hierarchy, based on inter se seniority. The issue became more pronounced in the elite services especially, the IAS and IPS. Are they public servants or masters? The veterans ( belonging to 1950's, 60's and 70's batches) share the perception of increasing deterioration in the quality of civil services. Corruption, it is believed by veterans, started increasing during the 1980s,of course in collusion with the corrupt, notorious politicians with little or no respect for bureaucracy and endowed with massive, vague discretionary powers. No transparency, no accountability. The present bureaucrats instead of imbibing the rare qualities of ICS, their distant cousins, discovered it more fruitful to be politically pliable for getting plush postings, protection from punishment for indulging in unethical practices. So, instead of squarely blaming the politicians,70% bureaucrats must also own the responsibility for poor governance. This is the view expressed by a senior IAS officer of 1960 vintage in his memoirs. I wrote the IAS etc examination in 1971. Things were quite different, then. Having served in UPSC at a critical position, I had tendered evidence to a high -powered committee in UPSC for reforms. I am not aware of what happened thereafter. But, corruption continues to grow with vengeance. The spineless, pliant bureaucrats and their political masters have vested interests in maintaining the status quo. Another shocker. While interacting with some veteran IAS officers( retired as States' Chief Secretaries and Addl Chief Secretaries), I found their main grievance was that they have no powers and that all powers vest with the IPS officers ,of course, with political support. Mutual admiration club! Addl chief secretaries enjoy more powers than their chief secretaries. Worse, SHO, SP, SSP enjoy huge powers due to close proximity with politicians. I say it with malice towards none. So,in ultimate analysis, the spineless, politically pliant, corrupt, ambitious bureaucrats and their political masters are responsible for poor performance of the State they are encadred with. DOP&T and UPSC are helpless in reforming the system. Decisions are taken without a consultative mechanism. Media is self-seeking. No option. We have to stoically learn to live with the system.
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)