360 degree assessment
Even honest officers have not been empanelled. They just ask “What is their fault”. Is this because of 360 degree assessment.
R C Nigam
NDA govt taking tough call on CIL !
I guess this time their lobby has not worked for them. NDA govt is at least taking tough call on CIL where Board Director consider them self as a Demigod as local economy depend on Coal so there are getting the a lot of respect of locals and which made them arrogant as well as senior management i.e. GM and DGM give them more value than what they deserv. Managing politican and Trade union does not work this time. unfortunately Coal India looses very deserving officer for the position N. Kumar Director (Tech) CIL, he would definitely be best the best option if he would be alive
Rishi
It would be disastrous
Bringing in Coal India Limited an IAS officer as CMD, would be disastrous. IAS officials are never loyal to any subjects. It will be appropriate to appoint a senior IRTS officer Babu, who deals with the subject of coal day in and day out, as CMD-CIL.
B B Srivastava
Indianise the litigation system
Abpoout 3.1 crore cases are reported to be pending in courts. The major cause for the huge pendency is the costly system of dispensation of justice borrowed from abroad. When it has been accepted that alternate dispute settlement system is a very efficacious mechanism, why have we not gone for an alternate system of filing cases, hearings and disposal? Why should every case be accompanied by an affidavit? It should suffice if the petitioner(s) sign an undertaking which forms the text of the affidavit, dispensing with the Notary/OC signing it for payment? Should the plaint run in to thousands of pages when the issues can be raised in a single page? Why can’t the judge go through the material on record and dispose it off after one or two hearings if required for any clarification? Parties to the case can raise their objections in one go rather than innumerable hearings going on for years even in the simplest of cases? The poor litigant is being robbed “lawfully’ by the system which benefits only the lawyer, Notary, stamp vendor, typist and others associated. It destroys millions of trees by wasteful use of millions of tonnes of paper!During the Licence Raj, this used to be fate of applications for an industrial licence which pended for decades!
M L Gupta
R C Nigam
NDA govt taking tough call on CIL !
I guess this time their lobby has not worked for them. NDA govt is at least taking tough call on CIL where Board Director consider them self as a Demigod as local economy depend on Coal so there are getting the a lot of respect of locals and which made them arrogant as well as senior management i.e. GM and DGM give them more value than what they deserv. Managing politican and Trade union does not work this time. unfortunately Coal India looses very deserving officer for the position N. Kumar Director (Tech) CIL, he would definitely be best the best option if he would be alive
Rishi
It would be disastrous
Bringing in Coal India Limited an IAS officer as CMD, would be disastrous. IAS officials are never loyal to any subjects. It will be appropriate to appoint a senior IRTS officer Babu, who deals with the subject of coal day in and day out, as CMD-CIL.
B B Srivastava
Indianise the litigation system
Abpoout 3.1 crore cases are reported to be pending in courts. The major cause for the huge pendency is the costly system of dispensation of justice borrowed from abroad. When it has been accepted that alternate dispute settlement system is a very efficacious mechanism, why have we not gone for an alternate system of filing cases, hearings and disposal? Why should every case be accompanied by an affidavit? It should suffice if the petitioner(s) sign an undertaking which forms the text of the affidavit, dispensing with the Notary/OC signing it for payment? Should the plaint run in to thousands of pages when the issues can be raised in a single page? Why can’t the judge go through the material on record and dispose it off after one or two hearings if required for any clarification? Parties to the case can raise their objections in one go rather than innumerable hearings going on for years even in the simplest of cases? The poor litigant is being robbed “lawfully’ by the system which benefits only the lawyer, Notary, stamp vendor, typist and others associated. It destroys millions of trees by wasteful use of millions of tonnes of paper!During the Licence Raj, this used to be fate of applications for an industrial licence which pended for decades!
M L Gupta