Whispers Forum

The appellant sought certain information about the enrollment number an advocate, authenticated copy of certificate of enrolment and other supporting documents, educational qualification etc. The PIO admitted that reply to the instant RTI Application was not provided, but submitted that their office has been receiving repeated RTI Applications asking for similar information about third parties, i.e personal information of other advocates and on all instances, their office has duly replied to these RTI Applications. In the instant case also, the information stands duly exempted from disclosure under Section 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. Noting that no reply was provided to the Appellant, the CIC observed that it is a violation of the provisions of the RTI Act. The PIO was directed to send a proper written submission to the CIC along with supporting documents to show cause as to why no action should be initiated in the matter under Section 20 of the RTI Act for not providing any reply to the instant RTI Application within the stipulated time frame of the RTI Act and even thereafter.
Comments
The appellant had not claimed any larger public interest for disclosure of information which was sought. However, the PIO committed the folly of not responding to the RTI application within the prescribed time limit and is facing a show-cause notice for his failure to do so. All PIOs must ensure timely replies to RTI applications lest they find themselves in a serious condition.
Citation: R Karanjai v. Bar Council of West Bengal, CIC/BCOIN/A/2022/134939; Date of dicsion: 03/05/2023
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com

The Congress’s joy of landslide victory in Karnataka has been followed by a bitter battle for the post of CM. It seems Congress is going to squander the advantage too quickly. This will surely affect the party's prospects. There was an opportunity for the party to build on this victory achieved after hard work and long wait. The victory served to boost the morale of party workers and other states also. But what is happening in the southern state is not good for Congress. The same is the situation in Rajasthan where BJP will surely benefit from the tussle between Gehlot and Pilot.
Neha Kumari

BJP lost badly in the Karnataka poll due to several reasons such as its autocratic style of functioning, misuse of religion, official agencies, taxpayers fund, over-confidence and extravagance. Public has grown wiser and is no longer influenced by political rhetoric.
BJP is not infallible. It has serious flaws, which need to be overcome. It must resort to chintan, manthan to analyse causes of its failure. First thing first. Collective arrogance is its first and the foremost enemy. It must rein in its loose cannons and acolytes. Its enemies hide within, not outside. All must be shown the door.
The Congress would be wrong to take credit for its victory nor attribute it to Rahul Gandhi's country-wide yatra. Far from it. It must thank BJP for its undeserved electoral victory.
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)

The appellant sought detailed information about depreciation on import transactions, losses suffered, interest levied on buyers, insurance claim rejected, unsecured receivables, ratings, non-predetermined sales, FIR, Audit etc. The Advocates for the Respondents strongly condemned all the contentions of the Appellant contained in the Second Appeal and explained the replies provided to each point of the instant RTI Application. The CIC observed that the information sought for in the RTI Application is unspecific and humungous and does not even conform to the word limit of 500 as prescribed in Rule 3 of RTI Rules, 2012. The CIC held that it would be impossible for the public authority to provide information of such magnitude in any form and will be further unreasonable to expect the PIO to correctly apply their mind to decipher what information can be provided or what should be exempted. The CIC dismissed the appeal.
Comments
The RTI Rules are explicit that the word limit of 500 cannot be used to deny information to an applicant. The PIO should attempt to decipher the RTI Application with utmost diligence to provide the maximum permissible information and invoke relevant exemption clauses of the RTI Act, if applicable.
Citation: Samir Sardana v. PEC Limited, CIC/PECLT/A/2022/624382; 27.04.2023
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com

Two Empires: Mughal & British? It is strange that the British are made fun in Indian films but the Mughals are glorified. Is it a true account of the Indian history? Wouldn’t the Mughal imperialism have continued if the British imperialism had not destroyed them completely? The Mughals destroyed India in every manner- economic, agriculture, religion, intellectual. They destroyed libraries and prohibited learning Indian works of knowledge like the Vedas. The British, on the contrary, contributed greatly to the dissemination of the knowledge contained therein and encouraged valuable interaction at scholars and academicians level. They exploited India but in the process laid the foundation of development. Our love-hate relationship is too deep and strong. We don’t like them for their colonial misdeeds and they don’t like us for destroying the British Empire! More for this reason, there is a need for historical review of our long association. The royal ceremony on the 6th May 2023 reminded me of that fairy tale London evening through late in to the night when Prince Charles and Lady Diana were married and the romantic spell it cast on the people assembled outside the Buckingham Palace- only to be seen to be enjoyed with the British Royalty in all its regalia and the doting people weaving a unique magic of an ethereal kind. I watched the entire proceedings in great amusement since the institution of Princes had been abolished in India (exceptions apart) and their privy purses snatched! Britain retains the Royalty to attract tourists even today. Makes good sense and economics beyond mere democracy, socialism or secularism!
M L Gupta

The above question raised in WIC dated May 5, 2023 is thought provoking. But, reasons attributed for bureaucratic "unhappiness", are secondary, even tertiary. Ground realities are different.
The fair-minded bureaucrats (other than sycophants) would agree that factors like : inability to cope with the "speed of PM Modi " and CBI taking action in graft cases as mentioned in the WIC, are not relevant and that these do not contribute to frustration in bureaucracy. Rules meant to punish the corrupt have to be followed.
The bitter truth is different. A reality check, if ordered, will reveal systemic flaws.
Firstly, the honest bureaucrats feel they are getting sidelined due to top down approach followed in decision making. Second, concentration of power and excessive political interference, cause demoralisation. Third, rewarding sycophants and bypassing merit, through misuse of discretion, is hated. Fourth, nothing pains the bureaucracy more than discrimination and when merit becomes a casualty. The silent majority of them is committed to public welfare, ethical approach and is averse to ad hocism.
The PM, it seems, is not being advised appropriately by his subordinates. He is urged to take the call and take corrective measures to ensure that all bureaucrats are treated even-handedly and with dignity by all those, who matter including politicians.
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)
AI and its negative power
AI has started ringing alarm bells due to its negative power. The USA and European countries have begun to formulate regulatory mechanism and propose guidelines. Artificial Intelligence will only add to our problems highlighted in a post today but mankind will surmount it.
M L Gupta