RTI Testing procedure for rejecting the product supplied by vendors by the Security Paper Mill
The applicant sought certain information from the Security Paper Mill like the standards for testing of parameters of Density, Brookfield Viscosity and Non-Volatile Solid in respect of Polymer (Flocculant). The PIO denied the information claiming that the actual and complete procedures can't be shared with or provided to others because it was their internal confidential documents and being a Security Organization and being a NABL Accredited Lab, they have to maintain the confidentiality of the organization. The CIC observed that the information has been denied without even invoking any exemption clause of the RTI Act. Repeated opportunities were afforded by CIC to justify the denial under any of the exemptions envisaged under Section 8 and/or 9 of the RTI Act, yet, the Respondent continued to harp on the ‘approval of competent authority’ and eventually quoted Section 8(1)(d) in an unconvincing manner. The CIC observed that what has been sought by this Applicant is merely the testing procedure followed by Security Paper Mill Quality Control Lab (SPM QC) for testing of certain parameters in respect of a product, Polymer (Flocculant), which is procured by Security Paper Mill (SPM) through public tender. SPM accepts or rejects the product supplied by vendors on the basis of testing carried out using these procedures and these testing procedures are, therefore, a matter of public interest, since vendors’ interests will be adversely affected if material is rejected on the basis of inappropriate / non- standard testing procedures. The information sought does not pertain to any of the core activities of SPM and does not affect security interests in any manner. Holding that this information must be provided and cannot be withheld on the ground of confidentiality, the CIC directed to provide the information.
Comments
Without properly invoking section 8 or section 9 of the RTI Act, a PIO should not reject the application seeking information. If the interests of a vendor are affected by the procedure followed by the public authority, the public interest may be claimed to seek the details of such procedure.
Citation:Mahasweta M. v. Security Paper Mill, M.P., CIC/SPMIL/A/2022/635766; Date of Decision: 15.03.2024
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com
Forum Young voters must vote
It is reported that young voters are not interested in election. The young voters shall make costly mistake by not participating actively in the election. It is one significant personal experience gained at no cost. It will reduce the cost of coaching for competitive exams later in life as no amount of class room teaching can match personal experience. And everyone needs to know political system and government in the country if one seeks employment or takes up self-employment. They will have the opportunity to listen, analyse, evaluate, observe and watch the management of an election for a candidate or her/his party and arrangements required to conduct a free and fair election of such a magnitude. They will learn the economics of the election and the foreign attempts to influence, malign and vilify the process. They will also learn a lot about the judicial process involved. The preamble says justice ..political. The true meaning needs to be learned in the laboratory called election. Luckily the youth today is spared the ugly experience of “scientific rigging or booth chhaapnaa etc”. So, participate and vote as a duty to learn life's precious lesson in personal interest like the rest of education which will be needed when they enter jobs/self-employment."
M L Gupta