Copy of CAT orders under the RTI Act
Copy of a CAT order was denied under the RTI Act, 2005 advising the applicant to apply for obtaining copies of judgments/documents etc. of a particular case after providing the complete details of case as provided under Chapter XVIII of C.A.T. Rules of Practice, 1993. The CPIO & FAA relied on a division bench judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the matter of Chief Information Commissioner v. High Court of Gujarat, CA No(s).1966-1967 of 2020 dated 04.03.2020. The CIC referred to Apex Court judgment dated 11.04.2019 passed by a Division Bench in the matter of Institute of Company Secretaries of India v. Paras Jain, CA No. 5665 of 2014 wherein it was held that the existence of two avenues is not mutually exclusive and it is up to the candidate to choose either of the routes. Thus, if a candidate seeks information under the provisions of the Right to Information, then payment has to be sought under the Rules therein, however, if the information is sought under the Guidelines of the appellant, then the appellant is at liberty to charge the candidates as per its guidelines.
Comments There is confusion on account of varying stands taken on the issue by different benches whether judicial orders should be provided under RTI Act if there is an alternative procedure prescribed under any other rules. The alternate procedure might be lengthier, complex or costly and hence, it should be left to the individual to choose the one which he wishes to use. Till a final word emerges, the confusion unfortunately, is likely to continue.
Citation: Girish Damodar Gole v. Central Administrative Tribunal, CIC/CADMT/A/2022/666640; Date of Decision: 20.09.2023
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com
Comments There is confusion on account of varying stands taken on the issue by different benches whether judicial orders should be provided under RTI Act if there is an alternative procedure prescribed under any other rules. The alternate procedure might be lengthier, complex or costly and hence, it should be left to the individual to choose the one which he wishes to use. Till a final word emerges, the confusion unfortunately, is likely to continue.
Citation: Girish Damodar Gole v. Central Administrative Tribunal, CIC/CADMT/A/2022/666640; Date of Decision: 20.09.2023
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com