DEBATE-360 degree assessment
Why are officers agitated over the new empanelment policy? Your information is incorrect. The officers of the IPS and the Indian Forest Service are not at all agitated over the new policy. They are very happy with it. For years, the posts of the Central Secretariat, though open posts and meant as per rules to be manned by selection from 37 services, were manned exclusively by the IAS, by hook and by crook. Under PM Modi, this wrong has been corrected and for the first time, justice is being done. The IPS and the IFS(Forest) are also getting opportunities to man senior positions (along with services like IRS etc), for the first time (though as per rules, they should have been doing so earlier as well). They are all very happy. Even the IAS is not unhappy. Only the lazy and corrupt among the IAS are unhappy because the days when they were the lords and masters and could get everywhere just by kowtowing to their corrupt bosses are over.
Vijay Kumar
DEBATE (2) 360 degree assessment
I had already commented in your Forum on the unfairness of the 360 degree approach in the empanelment procedure as adopted by Government of India. I know of a few excellent officers who have not been empanelled as Joint Secretary simply because some disgruntled junior of theirs or some service colleague out of jealousy or a boss whom they did not please with sycophancy gave a bad opinion about them. In any case there is so much secrecy about this. Lack of transparency in the entire exercise is not a feature of good governance. I do not know who advised on this practice which started in Germany during World War II for military personnel copied by USA and then given up in these countries has been picked up by us. The procedure certainly lacks objectivity and must be given up. As a matter of fact officers who were not empanelled because of 360 degree inspite of having good track record should be given another chance by reviewing their cases. They should at least be provided with the opinions given by others so that they can clarify why so and so could be against them. Quite possible those opinion givers are themselves dishonest or corrupt.
Aarti Khosla
Respect after retirement
We live in an age of total bureaucratization where respect is neither earned nor given. Getting respect from one-time juniors, post retirement, is a rare honour. One should count one’s blessings with gratitude.
Attitudinal change in youth is a natural phenomenon in all departments- government, public, educational institutes etc. Retirees are not mandated to supervise jobs, nor record entries in APRs of the youth who served under them possibly sycophantically. Authority is necessary to “ extort” respect.
Merit , more often than not, becomes the casualty while Mediocrity laced with pliability, yawning sycophancy thrive in govt offices. Universal law. Irreverence on part of one-time juniors is to be pitied not hated. The aggrieved retirees can only appreciate the pleasure of being let down.
The retirees have no divine right to demand respect from their one-time juniors. It is too late to inject sanskaars into them. Best policy is to avoid visiting offices where one had served. We count ourselves as a force of 55 lakhs retired civil servants and deserve to be treated with dignity after having spent 35 to 40 years of service.
Let us petition PM Modi to suggest that “All acts of Irreverence by serving employees to retired employees”, must be declared “ Misconducts ”, attracting minor penalties.
Let us not lose hopes and fight for our self-esteem.
A K Saxena ( A retd civil servant)
Vijay Kumar
DEBATE (2) 360 degree assessment
I had already commented in your Forum on the unfairness of the 360 degree approach in the empanelment procedure as adopted by Government of India. I know of a few excellent officers who have not been empanelled as Joint Secretary simply because some disgruntled junior of theirs or some service colleague out of jealousy or a boss whom they did not please with sycophancy gave a bad opinion about them. In any case there is so much secrecy about this. Lack of transparency in the entire exercise is not a feature of good governance. I do not know who advised on this practice which started in Germany during World War II for military personnel copied by USA and then given up in these countries has been picked up by us. The procedure certainly lacks objectivity and must be given up. As a matter of fact officers who were not empanelled because of 360 degree inspite of having good track record should be given another chance by reviewing their cases. They should at least be provided with the opinions given by others so that they can clarify why so and so could be against them. Quite possible those opinion givers are themselves dishonest or corrupt.
Aarti Khosla
Respect after retirement
We live in an age of total bureaucratization where respect is neither earned nor given. Getting respect from one-time juniors, post retirement, is a rare honour. One should count one’s blessings with gratitude.
Attitudinal change in youth is a natural phenomenon in all departments- government, public, educational institutes etc. Retirees are not mandated to supervise jobs, nor record entries in APRs of the youth who served under them possibly sycophantically. Authority is necessary to “ extort” respect.
Merit , more often than not, becomes the casualty while Mediocrity laced with pliability, yawning sycophancy thrive in govt offices. Universal law. Irreverence on part of one-time juniors is to be pitied not hated. The aggrieved retirees can only appreciate the pleasure of being let down.
The retirees have no divine right to demand respect from their one-time juniors. It is too late to inject sanskaars into them. Best policy is to avoid visiting offices where one had served. We count ourselves as a force of 55 lakhs retired civil servants and deserve to be treated with dignity after having spent 35 to 40 years of service.
Let us petition PM Modi to suggest that “All acts of Irreverence by serving employees to retired employees”, must be declared “ Misconducts ”, attracting minor penalties.
Let us not lose hopes and fight for our self-esteem.
A K Saxena ( A retd civil servant)