Whispers Forum — 28 Jun 2021
DEBATE(1)
Politicians Use Bureaucrats? Politicians and bureaucrats are inseparable and indispensable to each other in a democracy. But these days, there have been instances that politicians dump a bureaucrat once their purpose is over. In such a case, the question that arises is that who takes more advantage of the situation?
Quid pro quo – The system of giving something in return for a favour granted or a gift presented, has generally been the norm. However, the administrative services, in India, post-Independence, got very little by way of quid pro quo from their masters, as the powers granted by the Constitution and exploited to the hilt by politicians made the wielders of power arrogant and supremely confident of no punishment being meted out to them for any kind of crime committed against the nation. The bureaucrats, who considered themselves indispensable, because they were the ones in touch with the masses, became pawns and puppets with their strings in the hands of their political masters as there was manifold increase in political powers to promote, demote, transfer and ensure the continuance of the tenure of bureaucrats. Furthermore, the two wings of democracy, the Executive and the Legislature, were in tandem actually trying to get the better of the third wing, the Judiciary, the only enlightened wing in India, the Judiciary, because of its education and knowledge. The need for sanction to prosecute criminals in high offices and bureaucratic hurdles made politicians sly victors in political and economic games of deceit and helped political leaders (read “ministers”) maintain status quo. The very fact that it was only in 2005 that the Right to Information became part of the Constitution is a glaring example of political control over the bureaucracy. Even the Right to Education has not been propagated enough for the people of India to benefit from, thanks to political maneuverings over bureaucrats. There is a conspicuous absence of Lokayuktas or ombudsmen in cases requiring prosecution and conviction of those in high office. In a country that claims to be the world’s largest democracy, the first casualty and the most damaging one has been dispensation of justice, thanks to the stranglehold over bureaucrats which our politicians have and we have witnessed shockingly distressing instances of these in the last two virus-ridden years.
Vinay Sethi
Cinematograph bill
I oppose the cinematograph amendment bill 2021.
Tarak
Heartiest Congratulations
It is really good to know that some of my known ISS officers have attained the Higher Administrative Grade. Kudos to all of you.
H S Chauhan
Politicians Use Bureaucrats? Politicians and bureaucrats are inseparable and indispensable to each other in a democracy. But these days, there have been instances that politicians dump a bureaucrat once their purpose is over. In such a case, the question that arises is that who takes more advantage of the situation?
Quid pro quo – The system of giving something in return for a favour granted or a gift presented, has generally been the norm. However, the administrative services, in India, post-Independence, got very little by way of quid pro quo from their masters, as the powers granted by the Constitution and exploited to the hilt by politicians made the wielders of power arrogant and supremely confident of no punishment being meted out to them for any kind of crime committed against the nation. The bureaucrats, who considered themselves indispensable, because they were the ones in touch with the masses, became pawns and puppets with their strings in the hands of their political masters as there was manifold increase in political powers to promote, demote, transfer and ensure the continuance of the tenure of bureaucrats. Furthermore, the two wings of democracy, the Executive and the Legislature, were in tandem actually trying to get the better of the third wing, the Judiciary, the only enlightened wing in India, the Judiciary, because of its education and knowledge. The need for sanction to prosecute criminals in high offices and bureaucratic hurdles made politicians sly victors in political and economic games of deceit and helped political leaders (read “ministers”) maintain status quo. The very fact that it was only in 2005 that the Right to Information became part of the Constitution is a glaring example of political control over the bureaucracy. Even the Right to Education has not been propagated enough for the people of India to benefit from, thanks to political maneuverings over bureaucrats. There is a conspicuous absence of Lokayuktas or ombudsmen in cases requiring prosecution and conviction of those in high office. In a country that claims to be the world’s largest democracy, the first casualty and the most damaging one has been dispensation of justice, thanks to the stranglehold over bureaucrats which our politicians have and we have witnessed shockingly distressing instances of these in the last two virus-ridden years.
Vinay Sethi
Cinematograph bill
I oppose the cinematograph amendment bill 2021.
Tarak
Heartiest Congratulations
It is really good to know that some of my known ISS officers have attained the Higher Administrative Grade. Kudos to all of you.
H S Chauhan