Tuesday, October 20, 2026
Live
“
“
Right to Information

RTI Corner

Key RTI rulings, CIC decisions and what they mean for citizens — archived by date.

0 posts 0 months Latest: 6 Jan 2020
  Browse by date   All posts382
  202630
  202545
  202447
  202348
  202242
  202142
  202037
  201931
  201837
  201723

2020 37 posts · page 4 of 4

Clear filter
Monday, 6 January 2020

Timely reply should be provided under RTI Act without any reminder

The appellant sent a letter to the CBSE seeking correction of name in CBSE certificate and subsequently sought an action taken report under RTI Act. The appellant submitted that the correction of his name in the CBSE certificate was done by the respondent authority though delayed by over a year and a half. The PIO submitted that the grievance of the appellant was redressed properly. The CIC observed that since the grievance of the appellant was redressed and the appellant is satisfied with the same, there is no scope for intervention in the matter. However, the PIO should note that the reply/information must be supplied within the time limit as laid down in the RTI Act. Interim replies have to be followed up with final relies as soon as possible, without the appellant needing to send any reminder in this regard.
Comments
There has been an increase in the use of RTI Applications seeking an action taken report on a complaint or a request for a particular action. In a large number of applications, filing of RTI Application has led to a positive outcome for the applicant.
Citation: Shyad Hafijur Rahman v. CPIO, Central Board of Secondary Education in Decision no.: CIC/CBSED/A/2018/141146/02268, Date of Decision: 05/12/2019
Dr. Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is an expert on RTI matters and has co-authored the books RIGHT TO INFORMATION - LAW AND PRACTICE and PIO’s guide to RTI. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link: www.rtifoundationofindia.com