Allegation of altering date of birth for recruitment
The appellant submitted before the CIC that the denial of information u/s 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act is not correct as the third party against whom he had sought information had submitted fake documents, altering his date of birth to get recruited into the Army. He argued that the matter is of public interest and the information should be provided to him. The PIO informed that there is no documentary evidence regarding manipulation of date of birth in civil education certificate in respect of said individuals. The CIC observed that all the notings/ correspondence which took place while processing of the said complaint becomes personal information of that third party and except for the final outcome of the complaint, no other information can be provided to the appellant. Therefore, the CPIO was right in denying the information u/s 8(1)(j) of the RTI Act. The CIC noted that the appellant had already filed an FIR which will take separate cognizance of the accusation if the accused is found guilty.
Comments
This case shows that mere allegation is not enough to invoked the clause of public interest. It has to be backed by evidence if the desires that the personal information be disclosed. Similarly, it has the contention in many cases that the file-notings should be disclosed if the person has been found guilty or otherwise.
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com
Comments
This case shows that mere allegation is not enough to invoked the clause of public interest. It has to be backed by evidence if the desires that the personal information be disclosed. Similarly, it has the contention in many cases that the file-notings should be disclosed if the person has been found guilty or otherwise.
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Visakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books, RTI Right to Information - Law and Practice and PIO’s Guide to RTI. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and Third party audit. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation of India at the link www.rtifoundationofindia.com