Whispers Forum

The appellant sought information about the SC and ST Professors currently employed at IIM Ranchi, the vacancy position, the special recruitment drives etc. which did not result into any response from the PIO. The Respondent submitted that the RTI application was forwarded to Mr. Amit Kumar, (HR), subsequently, reminders were also sent but no response had been received from him. Upon receipt of hearing notice, the information was collected from the concerned office and uploaded on the Commission’s weblink. The CIC noted that the respondent has not responded to the RTI application in spite of over 1½ years having elapsed. The reply uploaded on Commission’s web portal has not provided to the appellant. The CIC noted that the PIO has not been made any efforts to furnish a response to the appellant even upon receipt of hearing notice and he failed to explain the cogent reasons for the same. The CIC issued a Show-cause notice to PIO, Mr. Rajasekhar David, Assistant Professor, as to why action under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act should not be initiated against him for not responding to the RTI application within stipulated time.
Comments
It is disquieting that instances continue to arise where the CIC has no option but to issue show-cause notices to PIOs for neglecting to respond to RTI applications within the statutory timeframe, thereby inviting penal action under Section 20(1) of the RTI Act. If the case pertains to a premier management institute, one wonders whether it is a case of lack if awareness of the provisions of the RTI Act.
Citation: Raju Paswan v. Indian Institute of Management Ranchi, Second Appeal No. CIC/IIMRC/A/2024/643443; Date of Decision: 14.10.2025
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Vishakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books PIO’s Guide to RTI and Right to Information – Law and Practice. Her weekly article is being published since 2008 on this site. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and third party audit to individuals / organisations. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation at the link https://www.rtifoundationofindia.com

Longevity does not come from a single supplement, drug or hack, rather it is the cumulative effect of many small, consistent choices over time. It is not the diet, it is not the exercise and certainly it is not the genetics. The main factor behind a healthy heart, a healthy brain the entire healthy body and longevity is ‘No Chronic Stress’ rest everything else in the world is secondary. Even if you train daily, you eat healthy, you quit smoking but if you are under constant stress you will still age faster not just by your skin but also from the internal organs.
What does matter, according to the strongest evidence so far, is a combination of lifestyle fundamentals which includes regular physical activity, good sleep and stress management. Secondly, nutrition patterns, not a super food, but overall dietary quality, calorie balance and metabolic health. Thirdly avoiding major harms that is smoking, excess alcohol and chronic inactivity.
So, rule number one - do not engage into anything that is creating internal resistance. You hate your job but continue for money, minus the 15 years of life. You surround yourself with people who drain out your energy, minus the 10 years of life. Every single day living in the same toxic environment is going to age you at a considerable level. Rule number two - social connection matters more than material attachment. People who have strong social connection live longer up to fifty per cent and it is definitely not about having many friends or relations, it is about having meaningful ones. So even one person who allows you to be truly yourself can extend your life more than a diet. Rule number three - find a purpose bigger than yourself. People with a clear purpose live an average of seven years longer. And it does not have to be a big mission but a strong one because what matters is the feeling that I am here for a reason, I am needed. Rule number four - listen to your body otherwise one fine day your body will stop talking to you. Sleep when you feel sleepy, rest when you feel tired, and eat whenever you are hungry because healthier people do not punish themselves, they follow the rules but they follow the natural rhythm. It is a myth that one should have dinner by sunset and such others. Modern life teaches us to push through and rest for later but you know what, the body cannot actually endure it because it is not designed like that.
Chronic stress is actually not about work, money, success or fame or the achievements. In fact it is the biggest misconception. Chronic stress is about the inner conflict of who we are and what we want to be and what we actually pretend to be in front of others. So when we are not living with authenticity, when we are not living an honest life, the life that is truly ours, the body stays under survival mode non-stop. Cortisol destroys the blood vessels, immunity gets weaken and brain function gets damaged. So people who are actually living healthier and longer are not consuming some magic pill but because they choose to live in peace within themselves. Even the most promising longevity drugs being studied (like rapamycin or metformin) do not replace these basics, they only potentially layer on top of them and evidence in humans is still evolving.
Subbiah Sridhar

Would a person who has been a part of bureaucracy all through his / her life change colours overnight? As a class who is more interested in hiding information during their entire service career, how can these individuals who become the torch bearers of transparency play any significant role in transparency? They are status - quoist, more concerned about their own perks and comforts. They may be competent, but you cannot expect them to bring a revolution, or even a huge change. With a fossilised mind, the orders are going to be nothing less than a caricature of what a decent order should be. LONG LIVE INDIA
Sushmita

A view has emerged that the Trade Agreement between India and the European Union could reshape global commerce, boost exports and counter rising protectionism worldwide. Further, the deal would help Europe achieve its objective of shrinking its reliance on China and diversifying its global supply chains. Europe will have the opportunity to access the big market in India.
Everyone in India and Europe seems in a celebratory mood. But, not President Trump. At least, so, it seems. He feels:”the deal amounts to European Union funding war against itself”.
Against this background, let us not forget, the deal is as much about geopolitics as it's about inter-continental business relations. It may face challenges in the fast-evolving geopolitical landscape and the unpredictability of the US administration that is using tariffs as a bargaining chip under the looming shadow of President Trump.
PM Modi feels "it is not just a trade agreement but a new blueprint for shared prosperity". President of the European Commission Ursula called the agreement as "the mother of all deals". Both see it as a win-win situation.
Let us wait and watch and hope the deal, which is still subject to ratification, assumes greater geopolitical significance ,as we go along. Let the ‘mother of all deals” turn into a game changer.
A K Saxena (Former civil servant)
Economic Survey
Economic survey confirmed the fears that reduction in corporate tax rates did not result in extra capital investment.the step increase profits and resulted in increasing income inequality.Therefore,the said corporate tax reduction should be withdrawn and matching relief should be given in individual tax rates so as to increase theis disposable income. As far as direct taxation is concerned,scruiny system should be scrapped altogether[as was done in Vajpeye government].Instead,NUGET approach be given wider adoption. Searches and subsequent assessments yield omly meagre extra revenue because post search assessments result in huge demand giving charge of tax terrorism and ultimately these demand gets knocked off in arduous and time consuming appeal proceedings.Instead,assese should be goaded into NUGET approach ,for this no penalty should be levied.
Rajesh Gohel

It is said that the age is both a story we tell and a number we track. If we measure the age, it is undeniable, that is, it counts time since birth. Age has long been used as a yardstick for ability, maturity and potential. From childhood milestones to retirement thresholds, society often treats age as a defining measure of who we are and what we can achieve. But is age truly a meaningful indicator or is it merely a convenient myth? As a myth, age becomes something else entirely. We start attaching expectations to it, such as, too young to know, too old to change, the right age to succeed.
On one hand, age does measure certain biological realities. Physical strength, cognitive development and health risks often correlate with the passage of time. These patterns help shape policies around education, employment and healthcare. In this sense, age provides a useful framework for understanding human growth and decline. Yet, age becomes a myth when it is used to limit individuality. Two people of the same age can differ vastly in experience, energy, skills, and outlook. Some reach career peaks early whereas others discover their purpose later in life. Creativity, resilience and wisdom do not follow a strict timeline.
After the age of 40, it hardly matters how much a person is educated or an illiterate. Many a times, when you are standing in tea stall, it is heart-rending to observe that a tea stall person is earning more and that too tax-free. Similarly, after the age of 50, a person may have been very handsome but after this age, wrinkles appear on the face and the person is no longer considered smart. Thus, there is apparently hardly any value to smartness after the age of 50. After the age of 60, you might have been working in top most position in any organization or even with your signature the city might have been administered, but now there are chances that even the security guard will not salute. So, after the age of 60, the value of post held vanishes. After the age of 70, the size of house hardly matters. There is no value to the size of house, when the knee starts paining and in fact bigger the house, more is the trouble moving from one room to another or from one floor to another floor in the house. So, seems better, comfortable and adaptable in small flat at that age. After the age of 80, even if a person beholds huge wealth, there is hardly any value to that money as you have to eat only a few hundred money worth of tablet. There is hardly any scope left to spend money on oneself for enjoyment at that age. Full life spent running after earning money with so many tactics and practices all seem to go waste at that age.
The thinking or theme that our time will come and we will enjoy the life later is all a myth. Actually, what is happening is we are all heading towards old age and in old age we are only going to struggle with disease(s) and we are going to see that our relatives, children and even household helps are going to enjoy with our money that we have accumulated . So, please wherever you are and whatever you have, put a stop and start learning to just enjoy with the money that the Almighty has bestowed and utilize the same properly.
Yours truly,
Subbiah Sridhar

Yes. Definitely, he is the most active CS ! He has always been on his toes and committed remarkable deliverables at all his postings! More power to him.
Shikha
Do we need highly modernised railway coaches
Recently, there was a post in which a senior railway officer said that only those who can properly use modern gadgets and maintain the facility provided in Vande Bharat coaches, should travel in it. He is absolutely correct. Majority of us, lack basic civic sense and do not know how to handle properly , equipment fitted in coaches. So the railways should not spend money for such luxurious coaches. What we need is simple, clean, well designed and comfortable , air conditioned coaches with clean toilets ( with water). More trains with such simple coaches should be their priority.
S. Gopal

Details of actions taken by the RBI regarding Action Taken on a letter addressed to the Governor of RBI by the appellant in respect of an alleged unauthorized transaction conducted by Bank of Baroda in violation of the Banking Regulation Act. The PIO informed that the said letter as mentioned in the query was not received by the Governor's office. The appellant enclosed proof of delivery of letter in his second appeal. The CIC held that the PIO has provided an appropriate reply to the RTI Application, as per the provisions of the RTI Act. The CIC observed that the PIO is only required to supply all the information/documents within his access. The CIC referred to the Delhi High Court judgment dated 06.12.2023 in Narendra Tyagi v. Assistant Director (CPIO) [LPA 764/2023] in which it was held that whether or not such information as provided by the PIO under the RTI Act is incorrect in any manner, is not the domain of consideration or determination under the RTI proceedings.
Comments
The Information Commission is the last bastion of fact verification and it is only the law points which are discussed at the level of High Court or Supreme Court. The Information Commission must seize the opportunity to verify the correctness of data provided by the PIO, and penalize the PIO if the information provided is factually incorrect.
Citation: Surjitsinh Mangrola v. Reserve Bank of India, Second Appeal No. CIC/RBIND/A/2024/655388; Date of Decision: 08.12.2025
Dr Anuradha Verma (dranuradhaverma@yahoo.co.in) is a RTI Consultant currently working with IIM Vishakhapatnam. She has co-authored the books PIO’s Guide to RTI and Right to Information – Law and Practice. Her weekly article is being published since 2008 on this site. She offers consultancy on RTI matters and third party audit to individuals / organisations. Her other articles can be read at the website of RTI Foundation at the link https://www.rtifoundationofindia.com

The retirement of around 300 IAS officers in 2026 marks a major personnel shift in India’s bureaucracy. It underscores the importance of strategic succession planning, timely recruitment, and administrative preparedness to ensure governance continuity and public service delivery remain strong despite turnover at senior levels.
Sreedhar Madanala
Panacea for all wrong
It is being suggested as if IAS is the panacea for all wrongs. In fact ,IAS officers with their huge egos are responsible for various ills affecting growth of the country despite Modi being there.
Rajesh

Is India ready with a budget proposal to face the headwinds during this period which will set the direction for the Viksit Bharat or an India which missed the great moment in its history? It would require radical reforms in personal income tax proposals to produce highly competitive talent in all walks of business. For years our tax slabs have induced emigration. Now both capital and talent are emigrating. Government does not provide STEMa education but the person spends the money running in to crores. S/he is entitled to rewarding remuneration by getting paid well, as s/he is valuable to the business. Our tax rates are instead a punishment @35%. So, one getting paid 1 crore pays up to 35 lakhs or more as income tax! They resent it, seeing tax evaders laughing at it. The highly talented and roadside venders are equal for tax purposes. For talent retention, upgradation, innovation, discovery and exports, India needs workers whose shortage/non-availability is rued by businesses. We are already losing business and opportunities, which will grow enormously in this critical phase of one year because the new world order has emerged with aplomb. This budget must exempt earnings up to 1 crore from personal income tax as it will be spent on products and services, which means increased job opportunities and excise/GST for revenues.
M L Gupta