Whispers Forum — 9 May 2020
DEBATE (1)
In this present power game no one is number one.
R K Jain
“Treat all Organized Services at par for generalist posts”
Suggestion of S Gopal (WIC, dated May 6,2020 ) for appointing a non-IAS officers as EO , though well-intentioned, will never meet the ends of justice, till officers of all organized services are given representation in promotions and postings. No level playing field. Presently, it is a battleground for the IAS v/s the rest.
There is no pay parity compounded by the delay in empanelment of cadres other than the IAS. All come through the common selection process through the UPSC. All central services officers feel hugely discriminated against the 'elite' Indian Administrative Service, the poor and distant cousin of the erstwhile India Civil Services .
Ironically, the competitiveness for superiority among IAS officers of even same batch, is not unusual. On the contrary, “under-cutting” among inter-Services officers ,is also noticed . Rivalry among officers of different civil services, prevails across the board- both at the Centre and States. Trust deficit hampers Good governance. The artificial distinction between IAS officers and the less fortunately circumstanced central services officers becomes evident even before proceeding for LBSNAA . Seeds of “superiority complex ”are sown early in career.
An artificial dichotomy. Top twenty officers of the merit list are privileged to call on President and Prime minister. One more IAS officers are attached to different central ministries for 3 months. The practice was established by PM Modi. Officers of other services are not considered fit enough even though they participate in central staffing scheme. Empanelment has always been dependent on the discretionary power of the Prime minister.
Officers of IPS, IRS and other services want an end to “ IAS Raj “ to secretary’s appointments . They seek pay hikes. The IAS officers, according to them, corner all specialized posts. Out of some 30 posts of financial advisors (JS and AS levels )in the government, 17 or so are manned by IAS with no specialization whatsoever. The empanelment process is discretionary, arbitrary.
Who benefits by creating artificial discriminations among Services officers ?They all come from same stock. Perhaps, the beneficiaries are the political class in cahoots with the pliant IAS officers, who get easily rewarded for their loyalty.
To sum up , appointments to generalist posts of Secretary and Secretary equivalent , must be thrown open to all organized services including the post of Cabinet Secretary ,Secretary ( DOP&T), Secretary (Revenue) , C&AG, CVC, Secretary to President , Establishment Officer (EO) and scores of others.
The Prime minister is urged to introspect over the matter in consultation with the union Home minister but without the aid of the coterie of elite IAS officers who have deeply rooted vested interests.PM is expected to be neutral in appointments matter. Performance Assessment based on integrity, honesty, commitment, hard-working nature, political neutrality and IB verifications from two independent sources,are necessary criteria
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)
In this present power game no one is number one.
R K Jain
“Treat all Organized Services at par for generalist posts”
Suggestion of S Gopal (WIC, dated May 6,2020 ) for appointing a non-IAS officers as EO , though well-intentioned, will never meet the ends of justice, till officers of all organized services are given representation in promotions and postings. No level playing field. Presently, it is a battleground for the IAS v/s the rest.
There is no pay parity compounded by the delay in empanelment of cadres other than the IAS. All come through the common selection process through the UPSC. All central services officers feel hugely discriminated against the 'elite' Indian Administrative Service, the poor and distant cousin of the erstwhile India Civil Services .
Ironically, the competitiveness for superiority among IAS officers of even same batch, is not unusual. On the contrary, “under-cutting” among inter-Services officers ,is also noticed . Rivalry among officers of different civil services, prevails across the board- both at the Centre and States. Trust deficit hampers Good governance. The artificial distinction between IAS officers and the less fortunately circumstanced central services officers becomes evident even before proceeding for LBSNAA . Seeds of “superiority complex ”are sown early in career.
An artificial dichotomy. Top twenty officers of the merit list are privileged to call on President and Prime minister. One more IAS officers are attached to different central ministries for 3 months. The practice was established by PM Modi. Officers of other services are not considered fit enough even though they participate in central staffing scheme. Empanelment has always been dependent on the discretionary power of the Prime minister.
Officers of IPS, IRS and other services want an end to “ IAS Raj “ to secretary’s appointments . They seek pay hikes. The IAS officers, according to them, corner all specialized posts. Out of some 30 posts of financial advisors (JS and AS levels )in the government, 17 or so are manned by IAS with no specialization whatsoever. The empanelment process is discretionary, arbitrary.
Who benefits by creating artificial discriminations among Services officers ?They all come from same stock. Perhaps, the beneficiaries are the political class in cahoots with the pliant IAS officers, who get easily rewarded for their loyalty.
To sum up , appointments to generalist posts of Secretary and Secretary equivalent , must be thrown open to all organized services including the post of Cabinet Secretary ,Secretary ( DOP&T), Secretary (Revenue) , C&AG, CVC, Secretary to President , Establishment Officer (EO) and scores of others.
The Prime minister is urged to introspect over the matter in consultation with the union Home minister but without the aid of the coterie of elite IAS officers who have deeply rooted vested interests.PM is expected to be neutral in appointments matter. Performance Assessment based on integrity, honesty, commitment, hard-working nature, political neutrality and IB verifications from two independent sources,are necessary criteria
A K Saxena (A former civil servant)